Imagine a compliance system cost $12,000 annually. How much is that?
It depends on what you are replacing.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence collection in a tangled technology environment, $12,000 could be a wise investment. If a seven person startup could manually gather the same proof in two hours per month, the result is very different.
It’s a smart method to begin your search for the Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the most features isn’t the first step. Consider what these features can help your business save time and money.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t intrinsically good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company with multiple cloud environments and various applications. The strain of manually gathering evidence on a regular basis could be very high. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and take evidence are able to justify the cost.
Consider a startup with 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. A high-end platform can offer significant capabilities, however those capabilities will only be of value when an organization actually requires the capabilities.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
The search for Vanta or Drata quickly turns into a feature-by -feature exercise. It is crucial to evaluate the services, features as well as the quotes and contracts of both platforms. Both are established systems for compliance that are focused on automation and integrations.
There’s another decision to make before that. Do you need a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Some businesses favor continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Other businesses would prefer to supply their own evidence, especially when workload is modest.
Vanta Competitors do not all use the same format.
Many Vanta competitors are also in a similar category that emphasizes automation. The market also has more lightweight platforms that focus on organization rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the second group. CertAssist was created by internal auditors as well as compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace. It also provides editable guidance on policy as well as evidence. Auditors can examine the evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers can upload their own documentation.
It is important to consider the access to the system.
It is obvious that removing integrations is a disadvantage. Someone has to gather evidence manually.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and ensures that the compliance software does not require constant connections to the organization’s operational environment.
Both architectures aren’t universally superior. The question is which choice is best for your company.
CertAssist will target teams of between five and 200 members. The price is disclosed instead of requiring an initial sales call to determine the initial cost. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist is $225 per monthly rather than the usual $375.
Let Complexity Get Its Due
Needs for startups today with 10 employees are not necessarily similar to the needs of the company that has 100 or 500 employees.
It is possible to maintain compliance with a an easy platform. As the amount of employees, systems, frameworks and evidence demands increase, the economics could eventually favor greater automation. It’s better to let the complexity of technology for compliance to earn its place.
Don’t pay for fifty different integrations because they look attractive on the chart of comparison. They’re well worth the money to perform the tasks they take over is more costly than manually performing them.