How to Compare Compliance Platforms When Vendors Don’t Publish Their Prices

Imagine a platform for compliance is $12,000 a year. Does that sound like a lot?

The answer is dependent on what it replaces.

If automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious work then $12,000 is an investment worth it. If a small business of seven people could gather the same evidence manually in a few minutes each month, the calculation is quite different.

That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t begin with asking which platform offers the greatest features. Ask what those features will allow your company to save time and work.

Automated Manufacturing is a Break-Even Point

It’s not intrinsically either good or bad. The value of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a company growing in technology that has hundreds of employees numerous cloud environments, a variety of applications, and constant access changes. The burden of manually collecting evidence on a regular basis could be very difficult. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and record evidence easily justify the cost.

Take a look at a startup that has 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.

That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a high-end platform are amazing, however they can only be of value in the event that an organization requires them.

Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands

Searching for Vanta vs Drata will quickly turn into an exercise of feature-by-feature. Both are well-established compliance platforms built around automation and integrations. Therefore, comparing their supported frameworks, integrations, service, agreements, and individual quotes are useful for businesses seeking that approach.

It’s important to choose an additional thing before you do. Do you have a company that is interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Certain companies want automated evidence collection as well as continuous monitoring. Other businesses would prefer to supply their own evidence, especially when the workload is low.

Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the same model

A number of well-known Vanta rivals compete in a market with the same focus on automation. The market also has smaller platforms based on the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.

CertAssist is a part of this group. CertAssist is a product developed by compliance consultants, internal auditors as well as other experts, organizes controls frameworks into a single workspace. It offers editable guidelines and policies for evidence and allows auditors to view evidence through read-only access.

It does not, in fact, connect to operating systems, nor install infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own evidence.

It is important to consider the system’s access.

It is clear that cutting off integrations could have disadvantages. Someone has to gather evidence by hand.

The application for compliance does not require any integration and can be utilized without permanent connections to the operational environment.

The structures of one are not superior to each other. Which tradeoff is right for your business?

CertAssist will target teams of between five and 200 people. Its pricing is published rather than requiring the salesperson to obtain the initial price. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist per month is $225 instead of a regular $375.

Let Complexity Take Its Place

The needs of a 10-person startup today won’t necessarily be its needs at 100 or 500 employees.

A simple platform could be beneficial while compliance stays simple. Automation’s cost-effectiveness can rise as the number of employees, systems and frameworks expand. Better to let the complexity of technology for compliance to earn its rightful place.

Don’t buy fifty different integrations just because they look attractive on the chart of comparison. It is best to pay for them only when the cost to do the task they replace manually is more expensive.